Team performance matrix
Capability against capacity, with a different staffing recommendation in each quadrant.
Flow: Team questions → placement → staffing recommendation
The questions
6 questions, each carrying weight into the quadrant analysis engine.
1. How much of the work needs rework before it ships?
Most of it · Some of it · Rarely any
2. Could the team run a new campaign without outside help?
Yes · No
3. How deep is the bench for your key skills?
One person · A backup exists · Several people
4. How booked is the team next month?
Overloaded · Full but coping · Room to take on more
5. How often does growth work get pushed for urgent work?
Every week · Occasionally · Rarely
6. Do you have documented processes for the recurring work?
Yes · No
The outcomes
Each outcome has its own respondent copy, call to action and routing.
Train and relieve
Both skill and capacity are short
Hiring alone won't fix this and neither will training alone. Take work off the team first, then build capability on the space you free up.
See the done-for-you option
Add capacity
Strong team, no room
Your people know what to do and have no hours to do it. Outsource the build so your team keeps the parts only they can do.
See the managed build
Build capability
Time available, skill missing
You have the hours but not the know-how. A guided engagement teaches while it ships — cheaper than hiring for a gap you can close.
See the guided option
Self-sufficient
You can run this in-house
Skill and capacity are both there. Take the templates and the playbook — you don't need an engagement, you need a system.
Get the toolkit
See where your funnel leaks
Two minutes, eight questions. You get a scored profile of your capture-to-conversion system and the one gap to fix first — built with FunnelMagic itself.
No credit card. The scorecard is a live FunnelMagic funnel.